I was corresponding with some friends regarding the death penalty, and thought I’d share my standard rant on the subject.
Beyond the issue of verifiability of guilt (which pretty much rules out capital punishment right away, but let’s ignore that), my line on the death penalty is that its most clear motivation is revenge. None of the other motivations can be well defended with facts.
Deterrent: it doesn’t work that way. Most of the guys on death row aren’t smart or rational enough to be deterred by something so far away in space and time as another guy riding the lightning.
Garbage disposal: in general, solitary confinement for life is cheaper.
No, it pretty much comes down to eyes for eyes and teeth for teeth; that is, revenge.
Terry Nichols would have been better punished and less martyred if we had given him a nice little cell for the rest of eternity, and made him look like a fool for his condemnation of American tyranny. But the instinct of revenge in many of the victims couldn’t bear it, and I can’t say I’d feel differently. I’d hope I’d see more clearly how to best direct my vengeance, but I can’t swear to it. Can you?
I’d like to think we are above revenge as a society, but we certainly aren’t as individuals. Society’s rationale can rise above the passions of any given member, but I’m not sure how strongly we can question a society that chooses to be democratic about the ubiquitous impulse for revenge.
Would it be better morally if America had no death penalty? Yes.
But I’d personally kill lots of these bastards were I the headman. So how much can I really complain?
Hell, if I were in charge, it’d be a blood bath.